<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polyphasic sleep on hold &#8211; and Happy New Year!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lifestyledesignschool.com/2009/01/polyphasic-sleep-on-hold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lifestyledesignschool.com/2009/01/polyphasic-sleep-on-hold/</link>
	<description>An intimate account of  Marc Beneteau&#039;s life, travels, adventures, relationships, businesses, philosophies and other narcissistic ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:53:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://lifestyledesignschool.com/2009/01/polyphasic-sleep-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifestyledesignschool.com/2009/01/extremely-hypomanic-yesterday-crashing-today/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>My friend Dave H. wrote me as follows (posted with his permission)
______
I enjoyed your email. I wanted to address the self-involved comment.

I could see where someone would say that - all this personal evolution of me, consciousness experimentation etc. But here&#039;s the thing - you&#039;re writing  the contents of your head out there for people to read. I think anyone who does that will seem &quot;self-involved&quot; to other people. And yet, what else are you supposed to do? If you&#039;re going to get your writing out there for &quot;the world&quot;, then you&#039;re going to write out the contents of your head. And it&#039;s YOUR head. So I think it&#039;s going to seem self-involved to some people. When you&#039;re a famous author, people might still call you self-involved, but anyone in the limelight seems that way to the &quot;other&quot; people - the consumers of the art. I almost always think actors and artists are self-involved. By  the way, the multiple acknowledgements you made of Rebekah and the girls felt good to me. Hope you feel better soon. Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Dave H. wrote me as follows (posted with his permission)<br />
______<br />
I enjoyed your email. I wanted to address the self-involved comment.</p>
<p>I could see where someone would say that &#8211; all this personal evolution of me, consciousness experimentation etc. But here&#8217;s the thing &#8211; you&#8217;re writing  the contents of your head out there for people to read. I think anyone who does that will seem &#8220;self-involved&#8221; to other people. And yet, what else are you supposed to do? If you&#8217;re going to get your writing out there for &#8220;the world&#8221;, then you&#8217;re going to write out the contents of your head. And it&#8217;s YOUR head. So I think it&#8217;s going to seem self-involved to some people. When you&#8217;re a famous author, people might still call you self-involved, but anyone in the limelight seems that way to the &#8220;other&#8221; people &#8211; the consumers of the art. I almost always think actors and artists are self-involved. By  the way, the multiple acknowledgements you made of Rebekah and the girls felt good to me. Hope you feel better soon. Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
